{"id":27,"date":"2021-06-17T16:24:36","date_gmt":"2021-06-17T19:24:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/noticias-gerais.online\/?p=27"},"modified":"2023-02-21T23:34:04","modified_gmt":"2023-02-22T02:34:04","slug":"perigos-para-a-atmosfera","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/noticias-gerais.online\/en\/perigos-para-a-atmosfera\/","title":{"rendered":"Hazards to the atmosphere"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\">Are individuals dangerous to the atmosphere?<\/h3>\n<p>Are white Americans bad for the environment? Do white people have much higher carbon footprints than people of color?<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u2013 simply understand systemic truths in local climate emergency<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Dear JUSTICE,<\/p>\n<p>If you examine which lives are most affected by the countless harms of local weather trading, it becomes clear that racial concerns. This you can take into account the disproportionate struggle experienced by black victims of Hurricane Katrina, the high percentage of Latino farmers who suffer from heatstroke or worse each year, or the variety of indigenous lands contaminated with the aid of fossil fuel infrastructure . These examples are only in the US, mind you, and never even a finalized list of errors! And the immediate question is: given that white individuals are well protected from the local alternative climate, does this indicate that they are its main perpetrators?<\/p>\n<p>The answer is complicated. White people are, of course, now not a monolith. At one end of the spectrum, you have your white mega-billionaires with spectacularly high carbon footprints, both in terms of personal lifestyle and expert influence on the consumer tradition. In difference, you have the evil white inhabitants of, say, elements of West Virginia, whose bodies and cities have been completely decimated by the use of the fossil fuel industry. The gap between these two companies might lead an uncritical observer to exclaim: Aha! This proves that race is just a proxy for classification in this environmental equation!<\/p>\n<p>not exactly anymore. Income is certainly a crucial predictor of an individual&#039;s climate impact. It is a widely mentioned and intelligently researched indisputable fact that the more money you have, the larger your carbon footprint tends to be. An analysis with the help of Oxfam and the Stockholm Environment Institute found that these, the correct 10% of the global profit bracket, are responsible for a whopping 46% of emissions associated with consumption. And if you look at the list of places where the richest Americans live, about half live in North America or the European Union. A substantial element of relaxation is determined in China and the central east. It turns out that great wealth and lavish consumption are not exclusive to European descendants.<\/p>\n<p>but I cannot overemphasize this: the existence of wealthy non-white Americans is not a counterpoint to the indisputable fact that local climate disaster has become heavily perpetuated by white Western European ideas about domination. (Nor does the existence of negative white individuals who suffer because of our climate-destroying financial device.) Across all social classes, Western Europe&#039;s choice of \u201csuccess\u201d is based primarily on extractive economies, materialism, and individualism \u2013 each of them pillar of climate disaster. If you believe this basis, it is no coincidence that almost all of these mega-billionaires are white.<\/p>\n<p>The origins of global warming are<span style=\"color: #333399;\"> \u201crooted in an \u2018I know better\u2019 racism\u201d,<\/span> said Anuradha Mittal, executive director of the Oakland Institute, an innovative think tank. This certain sense of entitlement is a fundamental tenet of white supremacy.<\/p>\n<p>Traditionally, Mittal defined, white Americans have long been so convinced of their own racial and cultural superiority that they have been utterly ignorant of the harm they inflict on nonwhite populations and their natural substances in the name of \u201ccivilization.\u201d Examples abound: the economic Revolution (its associated emissions are widely considered the customary sin of climate change); colonization, an invention of white Western Europeans, which in addition to taking many indigenous lives, undid a good part of the tribes&#039; administration of an essential ecosystem; the American promise of \u201cfreedom\u201d that becomes, truly, built on the backs of enslaved individuals.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #333399;\">\u201cThe alternative to this financial treadmill is that you actually sacrifice those who are at the bottom and never part of the consumption patterns\u201d<\/span>, who use local climate alternatives, spoke of Robert Bullard, sociologist and founder of the environmental justice movement.<\/p>\n<p>that you can see that identical equipment works today within the approach that communities of color continue to bear the environmental penalties of American consumerist culture, often without reveling in its benefits. A new examination, for example, found that Asian, black and Hispanic Americans breathe more polluted air than white Americans \u2013 which is with the help of design. Particularly polluted delivery warehouses, industrial facilities, and highways were systematically placed in communities of color. And it&#039;s no secret that white-controlled governments have worked very defiantly to sustain pressure votes from people of color to stop them from reshaping this system. In fact, many are still at it to this day!<br \/>\nThe crux of your question, JUSTICE, is not whether every white adult is harmful to the health of the planet. It is even possible to separate white Americans as people from the legacy that white favoring methods have created in the world. And that&#039;s a really advanced perspective!<\/p>\n<p>However, this is not to suggest that white individuals do not benefit every day from extractive and actively dangerous systems erected by their ancestors, to the detriment of their non-white neighbors.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve heard many seemingly smart white individuals try to distance themselves from this colonial legacy with some version of, \u201cwell, now it\u2019s not like I\u2019m rounded by all this!<\/p>\n<p>In a personal word, I keep in mind that here is a difficult theory to deal with. My own ancestors came to the US in the mid-1700s, colonized coastal North Carolina, owned slaves, and fought the civil battle to protect their own slaves. They built a wrong nation for their own benefit, and I had a privileged existence in it because that&#039;s how they wanted it. Even 250 peculiar years later, it goes without saying that I have a responsibility to help tear down these unjust systems and build something fairer in your neighborhood.<\/p>\n<p>I&#039;ve written a lot about a way to weigh a particular person&#039;s responsibility for climate disaster against the backdrop of exceptional systemic dysfunction\u2014it&#039;s more or less the central predicament of every Umbra column. And it is clear that focusing on reducing personal household emissions without difficulty is not enough to address the harm inflicted by the use of environmental racism.<\/p>\n<p>If I buy an electric automobile, become vegan, put solar panels on my condo and compost, will I have satisfactorily completed this legacy and corrected the local climate crisis? Somewhat naturally no. And furthermore, the most effective reason I could have enough money with all the trappings of a so-called low-carbon subculture would be because of the generational wealth gained through the oppression of others and the extraction of natural resources.<\/p>\n<p>It is not appropriate as white people to look for a way to reduce our personal carbon footprints \u2013 it has to happen alongside a restructuring of an economic system that at the moment allows white and wealthy people to have outsized environmental influence, while nauseating and putting others in danger. One skills solution is the thinking of local climate reparations, which can take many varieties \u2013 they should not be cash payments to participants in affected communities.<\/p>\n<p>In an editorial for foreign coverage, Georgetown institution philosophers Ol\u00faf\u1eb9\u0301mi T\u00e1\u00edw\u00f2 and Beba Cibralic write, \u201clocal climate reparations are more appropriate, understood as a systemic approach to redistributing elements and changing policies and associations that have perpetuated harm.\u201d for example, the two call for reform of the latest housing equipment for foreign refugees, calling for thriving international locations to house migrants rather than denying them entry or relegating them to camps. Furthermore, they imply that industrialized countries notably increase their contributions to a Green Local Climate Fund that can support the poorest and most frontline international locations, mitigate and adapt to local climate change.<\/p>\n<p>I&#039;d like to leave you with this thought from Doreen Martinez that stuck with me, definitely in terms of my own lineage&#039;s role in perpetuating local climate disaster: It&#039;s not primarily about bringing these personal stories and injustices to light, but asking: <span style=\"color: #333399;\">&#039;What have you changed because of them?&#039; \u201d<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Os indiv\u00edduos s\u00e3o perigosos para a atmosfera? Os americanos brancos s\u00e3o ruins para o ambiente? Os brancos t\u00eam pegadas de carbono muito mais altas do que os indiv\u00edduos de cor? &#8211; simplesmente compreender verdades sist\u00eamicas em emerg\u00eancia clim\u00e1tica local cara JUSTI\u00c7A, se voc\u00ea examinar quais vidas s\u00e3o mais afetadas pelos in\u00fameros danos do com\u00e9rcio local [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-mundo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/noticias-gerais.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/noticias-gerais.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/noticias-gerais.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/noticias-gerais.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/noticias-gerais.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/noticias-gerais.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/noticias-gerais.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/noticias-gerais.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/noticias-gerais.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}